ABSTRACT
Background: During the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust Oncology Department incorporated the ultrahypofractionated regime of 26Gy/5 fractions alongside the moderate hypofractionated regime of 40Gy/15 fractions as part of local adjuvant breast radiotherapy treatment (RT) for eligible patients. We conducted a local study to assess the real-life experience of patients undergoing ultrahypofractionated schedule to compare feasibility and toxicity to the fast-forward trial during the COVID - 19 pandemic. Methods: A single institution, retrospective, qualitative study. Patients included had early-stage breast cancer and received adjuvant radiotherapy between 23 March 2020 and 31 May 2020, a total of 211 patients. Inclusion was irrespective of any other neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments. Data were collected retrospectively for treatment dose, boost dose and toxicity. Results: Of the total 211 patients, 85 were treated with 26Gy in 5# and 19 patients received a boost as per the fast-forward protocol. Of these 85 patients, 15.9% did not report any skin toxicity post-treatment. 63.5% of patients reported RTOG Grade 1, 15.9% had RTOG Grade 2, and 1.6% reported RTOG Grade 3 skin toxicity. 3.2% of the patients could not be contacted for follow-up. Of the 19 patients who received a breast boost, 10.53% reported no skin changes. 78.9% reported Grade 1 skin toxicity. Both Grades 2a and 2b skin toxicity were reported by 5.26% each. The patient demographics and tumour characteristics in our study cohort were comparable to those within the fast-forward trial. In terms of post-RT skin toxicity, fewer patients reported any toxicity in the UHB patient cohort versus those in the trial, and the number of Grade 2/3 toxicities reported was also low. A delay in toxicity reporting from 2 weeks for 40Gy/15 to 3 weeks for 26Gy/5 was observed. Conclusion: Our study concluded that offering ultrahypofractionation was convenient for patients;reducing the number of hospital visits during the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic appeared safe in terms of acute post-RT-related skin toxicity. The reduced hospital visits limited exposure of patients and staff to the SARS-CoV-2 virus while also ensuring efficient use of Radiotherapy Department resources. Local follow-up protocols have been amended to ensure review at 3 weeks for the 26Gy/5 schedule to acknowledge the delay in acute toxicity development. To date, there is only 5-year toxicity and relapse data available from the fast-forward trial;therefore, hypofractionation schedules should be offered to patients as long as they fulfil the criteria and understand the limitations of the study as well as accelerated peer review processes in the face of the pandemic. © 2022 The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Spontaneous perforation of the pharynx has been rarely reported in the literature. Cases of barotrauma from stifling a sneeze have been reported previously. Symptoms are often non-specific which makes diagnosis challenging. We report a case of 63-year-old man nearing completion of chemoradiotherapy for base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma who was referred after feeling a ‘tearing’ sensation in his neck after sneezing. This is the first case reported in the literature of oropharyngeal perforation secondary to a sneeze in a patient with a head and neck tumour undergoing radiotherapy.